Codex Help Desk

This video, which Helene mentioned yesterday, is delightful in itself but also a great, entertaining way to demonstrate to students that the codex and scroll are information technologies.

Video | Posted on by | Leave a comment

The book and its post-digital afterlife

Thank you all once again for an interesting and deeply engaging week among the books. I’ve been carrying our conversations around with me, and–unsurprisingly–
I am seeing the anxieties of the book in everything I read.

I just wanted to share an article, What will become of the paper book? from Slate, which takes up questions of form and readership with some interesting insights on design and commerce. For those keen on meditations on everyday objects, an article in the same series makes the paper clip into a thing of perfection.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

More pictures

Now that I’m home and can get the photos off of my nice camera, I thought I’d add a few here for nostalgia’s sake.

Click through the images to my Flickr page to see few more.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Folger Library bindings image database

I saw this announced via the SHARP list serv today and thought it might be of interest. The Folger Shakespeare Library has launched a database of images of more than 1,000 bindings from their collection.

According to the announcement:

Recording information about binding structure and decoration can reveal items where the same or similar tools may have been used at different times by different binders or binding workshops. Uncovering such similarities can also help link multiple bindings to individual owners, collectors, binders, or workshops –even in cases where a binder may be as yet unidentified –as well as to specific geographical regions or time periods.

Interesting! We didn’t talk much about bindings last week–probably because for the most part we were focusing on books where the binding would have been an entirely different project from the printing, but it had not occurred to me before that tracking binding tools and techniques might help trace ownership of books.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What if we described books like we describe beer?

We’ve talked a lot this week about the sensory experience of books. I confess that I often grow weary of this conversation (Yes, I snarkily use the #smellofbooks hashtag on Twitter) because I had resigned myself to the idea that we can’t express this digitally, and we should just accept this and move on to more practical endeavors.

But I was wrong.

It occurred to me: there are lots of sensory experiences that we try to describe, for the benefit of others, in text/digital form. The one that came to mind for me first–no surprise!–was the beer review. (Don’t forget to check out the DHSI beer review site, if you haven’t done so already!)

There’s a whole cultural procedure when it comes to reviewing beer (or wine, or food, or anything, I suppose). You approach the drink, and you deliberately think about how it interacts with each of your senses–smell, color, density–and write that down, from the appearance in the glass to the aftertaste. You swirl, smell, taste, swallow, and document. You seriously use words like “mouthfeel” that get at a sort of cross-sensory tasting/feeling experience.

These reviews contain a strange mix of quantitative data, such as ABV, which describes how much alcohol is in it, and IBU, which describes the bitterness/hoppiness, and qualitative data, like what tasting notes you picked up. There is a mix of information that should also apply to someone else ordering the same beer (like ABV) and information that only documents your individual experience, like the price, location, and ambience of where you consumed it.

No one expects that reading a beer review will be the same as (or, God forbid, replace!) drinking a beer. But that doesn’t stop us from trying to say something useful about the sensory experience.

What if part of reading room practice were to take five minutes to look, touch, smell–and document!–the physical experience of the book?

Where would this information be stored and usefully shared? Mmm, I don’t really know. Doesn’t seem quite right to add it to an ESTC record. But to the record maintained by an individual library? Maybe yes. Get an idea of what it’s like to meet this book before you meet it.

I’m tickled to realize that there is precedent, and (thanks to DHSI 2012 colleagues) a wealth of colorful examples to draw upon, for usefully representing this kind of experience online.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A toast to us!

Please come to the Grad House for a celebratory drink after the end of presentations today!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Society for the History of Authorship, Reading and Publishing (SHARP)

As bibliographers you might consider joining SHARP:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment